From 6 April 2026, around 14,000 companies reclassify as small under new thresholds — meaning they will no longer need to issue an SDS. If your client is newly small, IR35 status determination responsibility shifts back to you. Check if your client qualifies →
What Is an IR35 Status Determination Statement?
An IR35 Status Determination Statement (SDS) is a formal written document that a client (the end-user of a contractor's services) must produce under the off-payroll working rules that took effect for the private sector in April 2021.
The SDS sets out the client's conclusion — inside IR35 or outside IR35 — for a specific contractor engagement, and gives the reasons for that conclusion. It must be issued to both the contractor and the fee-payer (usually the agency).
Without a valid SDS, a medium or large client is exposed to PAYE liability if HMRC investigates. The rules are set out in Chapter 10 of ITEPA 2003.
Only medium and large companies are legally required to issue an SDS. Small companies are exempt — the contractor's PSC determines its own IR35 status under the old Chapter 8 rules. Charities and public sector bodies follow their own rules regardless of size.
Free SDS Template — Inside & Outside IR35
Use the tabs below to select the version that applies. Copy the text, fill in the highlighted fields, and issue on company letterhead or via email.
STATUS DETERMINATION STATEMENT Off-Payroll Working Rules (Chapter 10 ITEPA 2003) Date: [DATE OF ISSUE] Worker / PSC: [CONTRACTOR NAME / PSC NAME] Engagement: [DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES] Contract period: [START DATE] to [END DATE OR ROLLING] Issued by: [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] Issued to: [CONTRACTOR NAME] and [FEE-PAYER / AGENCY NAME] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── DETERMINATION [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] has concluded that the off-payroll working rules (IR35) do NOT apply to this engagement. The worker providing services through their personal service company is considered to be OUTSIDE IR35 for this contract. ───────────────────────────────────────────────── REASONS FOR DETERMINATION The following factors were considered in reaching this determination: 1. Substitution [CONTRACTOR NAME / PSC] has an unfettered right to provide a suitably qualified substitute to perform the services. [CLIENT NAME] has no right to refuse a substitute on the grounds of personal preference. This right is genuine and has not been excluded or restricted by side agreement. 2. Control [CLIENT NAME] does not direct how the services are performed. The contractor determines their own working methods, tools, and schedule. [CLIENT NAME] specifies the outcomes required but not the means of achieving them. 3. Mutuality of Obligation There is no obligation on [CLIENT NAME] to offer work beyond the agreed contract, and no obligation on the contractor to accept it. The engagement ends on completion of the defined scope. 4. Integration The contractor is not integrated into [CLIENT NAME]'s organisation. They do not receive employee benefits, do not attend mandatory staff training unrelated to the engagement, and are not subject to [CLIENT NAME]'s HR policies. 5. Financial Risk The contractor bears financial risk. They provide their own equipment where relevant and are responsible for rectifying defective work at their own cost and without additional payment. [Add or remove factors as applicable to the specific engagement] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── CEST TOOL REFERENCE (optional but recommended) This determination is consistent with / supported by HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool. Reference: [CEST REFERENCE NUMBER IF AVAILABLE] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── SIGNED Name: [AUTHORISED SIGNATORY NAME] Position: [JOB TITLE] Company: [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] Date: [DATE] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── DISAGREEMENT PROCESS If the worker or fee-payer disagrees with this determination, they may raise a written disagreement with [CLIENT COMPANY NAME]. We will respond within 45 days with either a maintained or revised determination and reasons. Please send any disagreement to: [CONTACT EMAIL / ADDRESS]
STATUS DETERMINATION STATEMENT Off-Payroll Working Rules (Chapter 10 ITEPA 2003) Date: [DATE OF ISSUE] Worker / PSC: [CONTRACTOR NAME / PSC NAME] Engagement: [DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES] Contract period: [START DATE] to [END DATE OR ROLLING] Issued by: [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] Issued to: [CONTRACTOR NAME] and [FEE-PAYER / AGENCY NAME] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── DETERMINATION [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] has concluded that the off-payroll working rules (IR35) DO apply to this engagement. The worker providing services through their personal service company is considered to be INSIDE IR35 for this contract. The fee-payer ([AGENCY / CLIENT NAME]) is required to deduct PAYE income tax and National Insurance Contributions from payments made to the PSC, treating the deemed payment as employment income. ───────────────────────────────────────────────── REASONS FOR DETERMINATION The following factors were considered in reaching this determination: 1. Substitution The contract does not provide an unrestricted right of substitution, or in practice the worker is required to provide the services personally. [CLIENT NAME] has approval rights over any substitute, which indicates personal service. 2. Control [CLIENT NAME] exercises a significant degree of control over how, when, and where the services are delivered. The worker is integrated into [CLIENT NAME]'s team structure and subject to day-to-day direction. 3. Mutuality of Obligation There is an expectation of ongoing work and a continuing obligation to make the worker available. The arrangement resembles an employment relationship in its continuity and expectation of future engagement. 4. Integration The worker is integrated into [CLIENT NAME]'s organisation: attending team meetings, working with [CLIENT NAME]'s equipment, and performing work core to the business. 5. Other relevant factors [ADD ANY ADDITIONAL RELEVANT FACTORS, e.g. financial risk, exclusivity, benefits] [Add or remove factors as applicable to the specific engagement] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── CEST TOOL REFERENCE (optional but recommended) This determination is consistent with / supported by HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool. Reference: [CEST REFERENCE NUMBER IF AVAILABLE] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── SIGNED Name: [AUTHORISED SIGNATORY NAME] Position: [JOB TITLE] Company: [CLIENT COMPANY NAME] Date: [DATE] ───────────────────────────────────────────────── DISAGREEMENT PROCESS If the worker or fee-payer disagrees with this determination, they may raise a written disagreement with [CLIENT COMPANY NAME]. We will respond within 45 days with either a maintained or revised determination and reasons. Please send any disagreement to: [CONTACT EMAIL / ADDRESS]
What Must an SDS Include?
HMRC sets out the minimum requirements for a valid Status Determination Statement. A bare conclusion is not enough — the legislation requires reasons. An SDS that simply says "outside IR35" without explanation does not satisfy the legal requirement.
✅ SDS Mandatory Elements
The SDS Disagreement Process
Contractors have a statutory right to challenge a client's SDS conclusion. The process is as follows:
Contractor raises a written disagreement
The contractor or their PSC sends a written disagreement to the client, explaining why they believe the determination is incorrect. There is no prescribed form — a clear email is sufficient.
Client has 45 days to respond
The client must respond within 45 days with either a maintained determination (with updated reasons) or a revised determination. If the client does not respond within 45 days, the PAYE liability transfers to them.
Escalate to HMRC if unresolved
If the disagreement cannot be resolved, either party can ask HMRC to decide — through the CEST tool or by writing to HMRC's Employment Status team. HMRC's view is not binding but carries significant weight.
Who Issues the SDS — Company Size Guide
Whether your client needs to issue an SDS depends entirely on their company size. Use this table to check:
| Company Type | Must Issue SDS? | Who determines IR35? |
|---|---|---|
| Large company (exceeds 2 of 3 thresholds) | Yes | Client |
| Medium company (exceeds 2 of 3 thresholds) | Yes | Client |
| Small company (meets 2 of 3 small thresholds) | No | Contractor's PSC |
| Public sector body | Yes (always) | Public authority |
| Overseas client (no UK presence) | No | Contractor's PSC |
A company is small if it meets two of three of these criteria: Turnover under £15m (was £10.2m) | Balance sheet under £7.5m (was £5.1m) | Fewer than 50 employees (unchanged). If your client now qualifies as small under these new thresholds, they no longer need to issue an SDS and you determine your own IR35 status.
Common SDS Mistakes to Avoid
- No reasons given: The most common error. A conclusion without reasoning is not a valid SDS and exposes the client to liability.
- Blanket determinations: Issuing the same SDS to all contractors without individual assessment. HMRC has challenged these as non-compliant.
- Not sending to the agency: The SDS must go to the fee-payer (agency), not just the contractor. Missing this step means the client retains liability even if they issued the SDS to the worker.
- No disagreement process: Failing to include how a contractor can raise a challenge. This is a legal requirement, not optional.
- Reusing an old SDS for a new contract: Each new engagement requires a fresh SDS. A rolling extension on the same contract may not require a new SDS if nothing material has changed, but a new contract does.
- Issuing for a small company: If your client is a small company, they should not be issuing an SDS — you determine your own status. An SDS from a small company has no legal standing.
Not sure if your contract is inside or outside IR35?
Use our free IR35 calculator to model your take-home pay under both scenarios before your next contract decision.
Use the IR35 Calculator →